» Site Navigation |
|
» » » » Motorcycle Forums
|
» Our Partners |
|
|
|
 |
|
11-17-2012, 11:49 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 177
|
rpm range for shovel engine,,,
did a search,,,nuten,,,, can someone tell me the normal operating rpm range for a 77 shovel,,,, like what is a good cruzing rpm,,,, what is the "yellow"zone and where to stop at (red line),, thanks
|
|
|
11-18-2012, 05:04 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Greasy Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In my garage!!
Posts: 25,356
|
Cruising would be 2000-3000 rpms. Redline is 5000. A shovel isnt a high rev engine. Especially if stock. Stock hydraulic tappets can float. Solids are better.
__________________
__________________________________________
Football Season is over....
“When the going gets weird, the weird turn professional.” ~ Hunter S. Thompson~
Praise the Lowered!
11 year A.M.A. member.
4 year PA ABATE member.
RIP Rick Massey: AKA-Rubberdown. Godspeed, 02-02-12.
|
|
|
11-18-2012, 10:07 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 177
|
thanks bud,,,,,how do they handle luggin,,,, or well ,, I like to keep it slow and thumping if ya know what I mean,,,, no pinging,,,just throaty I guess if that makes any sense,,
|
|
|
11-19-2012, 12:20 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Western Montana
Posts: 498
|
Too slow of engine speed is hard on the crankpin and crank bearings. It's like beating it with a hammer. Even just to slow of an idle can beat up the crank bearing and crankpin. So be careful about chugging it to slow.
|
|
|
11-19-2012, 06:05 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Greasy Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In my garage!!
Posts: 25,356
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by grouser
thanks bud,,,,,how do they handle luggin,,,, or well ,, I like to keep it slow and thumping if ya know what I mean,,,, no pinging,,,just throaty I guess if that makes any sense,,
|
Shovels and pans handle lower rpms better than modern day engines for a few reasons. One reason was the cams and the other was being carbureted.
__________________
__________________________________________
Football Season is over....
“When the going gets weird, the weird turn professional.” ~ Hunter S. Thompson~
Praise the Lowered!
11 year A.M.A. member.
4 year PA ABATE member.
RIP Rick Massey: AKA-Rubberdown. Godspeed, 02-02-12.
|
|
|
11-19-2012, 11:04 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Munnsville, N.Y.
Posts: 947
|
As Dave has mentioned, a Shovel won't pull a big rpm as the cylinder heads really don not lend themselves to good cylinder fill.
With some attention, along with a cam swap they can do better, but not night and day, by any means, but a good bump nonetheless.
However, once a larger displacement(ie 93-103") is introduced under that head, velocity does come up, and then, the engine can start to take advantage of those overly-large ports.
Not uncommon for us to see 100 hp and 110 ft/lbs from a 103" Shovel, with modified OE Harley castings, surrounded by the pieces/parts that bring it all together. 
Scott
__________________
"Clyde played electric bass, he played it with finesse and grace."
|
|
|
11-20-2012, 01:06 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 177
|
I have an A grind Andrews in it, but am happy with the 70 or so HP,,,,, I just stepped down from a rocket,,,,116hp V65,,,,, I haven't had so much fun at 45 mph as the day I rode my Shovel home,,,,in the rain,,,,, thanks for all the help
|
|
|
11-20-2012, 07:36 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Munnsville, N.Y.
Posts: 947
|
As long as we can use a spring needed, we like the use of an Andrews #2 cam in those.
80" Shovel @ 8.5 cr, will usually dyno off between 65-70 hp, and 75-80 ft/lbs, SAE.
S&S E, drag pipes, OE ignition.
Scott
__________________
"Clyde played electric bass, he played it with finesse and grace."
|
|
|
11-21-2012, 01:38 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 177
|
my book quotes "62.0 hp @ 5400 rpm,,,," that is a bit over your stated red line and does not make sense to me ?????
|
|
|
11-21-2012, 02:32 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Greasy Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In my garage!!
Posts: 25,356
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by grouser
my book quotes "62.0 hp @ 5400 rpm,,,," that is a bit over your stated red line and does not make sense to me ?????
|
5400 rpm is fine for a completely new engine. Most Shovels have pretty many road-miles on the bottom ends and are rarely built from the ground up.
The cone motor is bulletproof but you're also talking an engine not made since 1984. Unless I knew exactly what I had, I wouldn't push it.
Make sense?
__________________
__________________________________________
Football Season is over....
“When the going gets weird, the weird turn professional.” ~ Hunter S. Thompson~
Praise the Lowered!
11 year A.M.A. member.
4 year PA ABATE member.
RIP Rick Massey: AKA-Rubberdown. Godspeed, 02-02-12.
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|