Chain drive/ Belt drive conversion - Harley Davidson Forums: Harley Davidson Motorcycle Forum
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old 07-10-2012, 12:19 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bristol UK
Posts: 48
Chain drive/ Belt drive conversion

My 1991 FLHS has a chain final drive, it left the factory with a belt final drive. I can only assume that one of the previous owners has had a problem with the belt drive and has opted to change to chain final drive.
The chain and sprockets are now showing signs of wear and I would like to take the opertunity to revert to belt drive, only I have no experience of doing this work.
Is it as simple as buying a front and rear pulley and a belt? Somehow I doubt it..........any help appreiciated.
Bountyhunter is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old 07-10-2012, 12:32 PM
ROOAADDD KINGGGGG
 
Rohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,018
Garage
It's going to be a pain in the arse. The other guys can chime in and tell you all about having to get the right pulleys and belt and taking apart the primary and all that fun stuff.

Why do you prefer a belt? I'm just asking because I decided to go the chain route on mine. I like that if I'm on the side of the road I can just get a new chain and put it on. I don't have to take apart my whole primary and slide the axle out of the rear wheel to change my chain if it breaks... which it won't... unlike a belt. As long as you keep the chain tight (but within specs), it will ride just as smooth as a belt and you can pay a little more and get a good O-ring chain that you don't have to worry so much about lubing. You can put tons of hp and torque through a chain too without having to worry about it breaking.

Chains are the way to go in my opinion but to each his own.


-Rohan
Rohan is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old 07-10-2012, 12:37 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bristol UK
Posts: 48
Only because the chain is pretty high maintanance compared to the belt, it's really dirty too, I realise that make s me sound like a girl! LOL!
and the belt is standard, like the rest of the bike.
I had assumed that the general concensus would be that the belt was king........maybe thats wrong and the chain is the way to go, it's certainly the chaeper option here in the UK.
Bountyhunter is offline  
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old 07-10-2012, 12:44 PM
Grandstanding Member
 
Dave63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 29,803
You have a chain-adaptor kit on the bike, that replaced the original belt drive. You need a front sprocket, rear 70 tooth sprocket, and likely the original front sprocket nut and retaining hardware. As well.... you'll need a belt, and a primary gasket kit, since the inner and outer primary will have to come off to replace the sprocket and install the belt.

According to your year/model, you'll need a 136 tooth belt.

(Fits 85-96 FXR, FLT, FLHT, FLHS, & Road King models with 70 Tooth Rear Pulleys (Replaces OEM# 40001-85)

__________________________________________
When the going gets weird, the weird turn professional.... ~ Hunter S. Thompson~

R.I.P. Rubberdown. 1971-2012
Dave63 is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old 07-10-2012, 12:45 PM
Senior Member
 
THE ROAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NorthWest Louisiana
Posts: 1,891
Images: 29
They got some killer chains out there for sale & like the man said , chains can take a lot of abuse & tons of horsepower and with o-rings there's very little maintenance . Plus you can run a much wider tire than with a belt . All of the pro-stock bikes use chains . Much easier to change sprocket ratio's to get the exact gearing you want . Chains are old school cool !
THE ROAD is offline  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old 07-10-2012, 12:47 PM
Grandstanding Member
 
Dave63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 29,803
With a chain, on a 1991 FLH (1.5" wide drive belt) you can go to a 150mm wide rear tire before it scrapes the fender/hardware.

With a belt, you can barely fit a 140mm, and a 130mm is stock.

The 150mm limit isn't just due to the fender/hardware scraping the tire, rather also because a 150mm is the widest tire recommended for a 3" wide rim.

__________________________________________
When the going gets weird, the weird turn professional.... ~ Hunter S. Thompson~

R.I.P. Rubberdown. 1971-2012
Dave63 is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old 07-10-2012, 12:53 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bristol UK
Posts: 48
Thanks for the replies, it would appear that the chain has multiple benefits. Maybe it's not a bad idea after all.
The cost is 250 for the chain and sprockets, whereas the belt alone comes in at 200.
Bountyhunter is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Harley Davidson Forums: Harley Davidson Motorcycle Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome